Page 62 - PAAT_Journal_V1-2019
P. 62

PAAT Journal Vol. 1, No. 1, (June 2019)




                                                                                                        
                                                                                       Kosit Fuangswasdi

                                                          Abstract

                          This paper is the first part of the Disruptive Public Management (DPM) series.  The new
                    public management (NPM) was introduced in the early 1990s as the conventional public

                    management could not respond to the public needs. Since then, many countries including
                    Thailand have experienced failures born by disadvantages of the NPM.  Under the disruptive

                    world environment, public  management of certain countries have started to become
                    disruptive intended to cope with the changing public demand.  This paper is an attempt to

                    quickly review the history of public management, documentary researches and case studies
                    of  selective countries including Thailand  and conclude with  recommendations on  how
                    Thailand should pursue with the DPM.  Only the disruptive public management can respond

                    to the need of the public in this disruptive world environment.


                    Keywords: Public management, new public management, disruptive public management.


                    Introduction

                          This paper is the first part of the Disruptive Public Management (DPM) series.  From Old

                    Public Management to New Public Management (NPM),  the world has gone  beyond
                    predictable changes into disruption.  The speed of change has revolved exponentially beyond

                    any conventional public management theories.  By the time the policy makers can evaluate
                    their executed public policies, the original public policy agenda has gone invalid and outdated
                    driving the outcome to be dissatisfied and unacceptable not only by the policy makers but

                    largely to the general public.












                      Ph.D. Candidate, Public Administration International Program, Department of Political Science, Faculty of
                    Social Sciences, Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University
                    Email: kositf@gmail.com


                                                                                                 ่
                                                             54                สมาคมรัฐประศาสนศาสตร์แหงประเทศไทย
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67