Page 65 - PAAT_Journal_V1-2019
P. 65

PAAT Journal Vol. 1, No. 1, (June 2019)


                    organization.  Externally, public management entails leading efforts to collaborate with private

                    groups to support the adoption of public policy.  Public management professionals must
                    therefore work with private citizens and other public organizations to keep public programs

                    running efficiently and effectively.  Under this capacity, major tasks are coordinating public
                    workforce to assist with projects and assisting communities to secure necessary resources to

                    implement public programs.
                          The underlying difference between both fields lies in the core definitions of

                    administration and management. Management is concerned with planning and acting, while
                    administration relates to the application of policies that dictate how management personnel
                    should act. The rules of public administration are instrumental to the process of developing

                    policy, providing a measure of guidance as to how those policies should be introduced to
                    societies. In contrast, the rules  of public  management dictate how civil servants  should

                    implement those policies. Public management is a hands-on approach that focuses on the
                    daily  tasks involved with  rolling out  policies, whereas  public administration prioritizes

                    controlling the hierarchies, rules, and regulations that contribute to instituting public policy.
                          With the introduction of production engineering in public service delivery in the 1980s,

                    many governments worldwide began to realize external forces pushing for changes in public
                    management processes, from public management to new public management (NPM).  The
                    first practices of NPM were probably introduced by Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher of the

                    United Kingdom.  Thatcher drove changes  in public management policy  in many areas
                    including organizational methods, civil service, labor relations, expenditure planning, financial

                    management, audit, evaluation, and procurement.  Thatcher coined herself as the prime
                    minister and policy entrepreneur.  New Zealand, Australia and Sweden were the first group of

                    countries following the change led by the United Kingdom.  The Organization for Economic
                    Co-operation and Development (OECD) established a Public Management Committee and

                    Secretariat to pursue detailed studies of the NPM and eventually adopted the same practices.
                    President Bill Clinton introduced NPM in the U.S. in the 1990s.  With the launches of National
                    Partnership and the Government Performance and Results Act, the United States has officially

                    adopted the NPM (Morisson, A. & Doussineau, M., 2019:101-116)).
                          With the introduction of at least  3 main driving factors including disruptive

                    technologies, VUCA (volatility, uncertainty,  complexity, ambiguity), and  the mega-trends;
                    public management professionals have found that NPM may  no longer  be the answer

                    responding to the needs of the society and the  public. The rapid of change is faster



                                                                                                 ่
                                                             57                สมาคมรัฐประศาสนศาสตร์แหงประเทศไทย
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70